Skip to Content
DocsArchitectureDifference: SOAP vs REST vs GRAPHQL vs gRPC

Difference: SOAP vs REST vs GRAPHQL vs gRPC

SOAP

What it is: SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol): XML-based protocol with strict standards and built-in error handling, security, and transaction support.

Characteristics: Protocol-heavy, stateful operations supported, extensive tooling ecosystem.

Use cases:

  • Enterprise applications requiring formal contracts (WSDL)
  • Financial services, healthcare, government systems
  • Systems needing built-in security (WS-Security)
  • Legacy system integration

Current status: Largely outdated for new projects, but still maintained in existing systems.

Why it’s discouraged:

  • Verbose XML overhead
  • Complex tooling requirements
  • Pool performance compared to modern alternatives
  • Limited browser support

Still used when:

  • Working with legacy enterprise systems, financial institutions with existing SOAP infrastructure
  • When WS-* standards are contractually required.

Example:

WSDL Definition (simplified):

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" targetNamespace="http://example.com/user-service"> <message name="GetUserRequest"> <part name="userId" type="xsd:int"/> </message> <message name="GetUserResponse"> <part name="user" type="tns:User"/> </message> </definitions>

Request:

POST /user-service HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8 SOAPAction: "GetUser" <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soap:Body> <GetUserRequest xmlns="http://example.com/user-service"> <userId>123</userId> </GetUserRequest> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>

Response:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soap:Body> <GetUserResponse xmlns="http://example.com/user-service"> <user> <id>123</id> <n>John Doe</n> <email>john@example.com</email> </user> </GetUserResponse> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>

REST

What it is REST (Representational State Transfer): Architecture style using HTTP methods with stateless, resource-based URLs.

Use cases:

  • Public APIs and web services
  • CRUD applications on resources
  • Mobile app backends
  • Simple, cacheable operations

Current status: dominant and widely used; remains the go-to choice for most web APIs. Why it’s still recommended: Simple, well-understood, excellent tooling, caching benefits, stateless nature fits web architecture.

Example:

API design:

GET /users/123 # Get user POST /users # Create user PUT /users/123 # Update user DELETE /users/123 # Delete user

Request:

httpGET /users/123 HTTP/1.1 Host: api.example.com Accept: application/json

Response:

{ "id": 123, "name": "John Doe", "email": "john@example.com", "createdAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z" }

GraphQL

What it is: Query language and runtime allowing clients to request exactly the data they need.

Characteristics: Single endpoint, client-specified queries, strong typed schema, real-time capabilities.

Use cases:

  • Frontend-driven applications with varying data requirements
  • Mobile aps needing efficient data fetching
  • APIs serving multiple client types
  • Real-time subscriptions

Current status: Strongly growing adoption. Use with care in write-heavy or streaming scenarios due to complexity and cache challenges.

Considerations:

  • Adds complexity (caching, security, N+1 queries)
  • Overkill for simple CRUD APIs
  • Excellent for complex, data-driven frontends

Example: Schema:

type User { id: ID! name: String! email: String! posts: [Post!]! } type Post { id: ID! title: String! content: String! author: User! } type Query { user(id: ID!): User users: [User!]! }

Query:

POST /graphql HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json { "query": "query GetUser($id: ID!) { user(id: $id) { id name email posts { title } } }", "variables": { "id": "123" } }

Response:

{ "data": { "user": { "id": "123", "name": "John Doe", "email": "john@example.com", "posts": [{ "title": "My First Post" }, { "title": "GraphQL Tips" }] } } }

gRPC

What it is gRPC(Google Remote Procedure Call): High-performance RPC framework using Protocol Buffers and HTTP/2.

Use cases:

  • Microservices communication
  • High-throughput, low-latency systems
  • Polyglot environments (multiple languages)
  • Streaming operations

Characteristics: Binary serialization, HTTP/2 multiplexing, code generation, bi-directional streaming.

Current status: Actively developed and increasingly adopted.

Considerations:

  • Limited browser support (needs grpc-web)
  • Primarily for backend-to-backend communication
  • Excellent for microservices architectures

Example:

Protocol buffer definition:

syntax = "proto3"; package user; service UserService { rpc GetUser(GetUserRequest) returns (User); rpc ListUsers(ListUsersRequest) returns (stream User); } message GetUserRequest { int32 id = 1; } message User { int32 id = 1; string name = 2; string email = 3; } message ListUsersRequest { int32 limit = 1; }

Client (TypeScript, generated):

import { UserServiceClient } from './generated/user_grpc_pb'; import { GetUserRequest } from './generated/user_pb'; const client = new UserServiceClient('localhost:50051'); const request = new GetUserRequest(); request.setId(123); client.getUser(request, (error, response) => { if (error) { console.error('Error:', error); } else { console.log('User:', { id: response.getId(), name: response.getName(), email: response.getEmail() }); } });

Differences Summary

FeatureSOAPRESTGraphQLgRPC
ProtocolUses HTTP, SMTP, etc.HTTPHTTPHTTP/2
Data FormatXML onlyJSON, XML, etc.JSON (or custom)Protobuf (binary)
ContractWSDL (strongly typed)None (or OpenAPI/Swagger)Strong schema (SDL)Strong schema (.proto)
FlexibilityRigidModerateHighly flexibleRigid but efficient
VersioningBuilt-inManual (URI-based)Schema evolutionBuilt-in via .proto evolution
PerformanceHeavy (XML overhead)LightweightVariable (can overfetch)Very fast, low latency
StreamingLimitedNot nativeNot nativeNative support (bi-directional)
ToolingMature in enterpriseWidely supportedStrong dev toolingRequires gRPC-aware tools

Recommendations

  • New web APIs: Start with REST, consider GraphQL if you have complex client data needs.
  • Microservices: gRPC for internal communication, REST for external APIs.
  • Legacy Integration: SOAP only when required by existing systems.
  • Avoid SOAP for new projects unless you have specific enterprise requirements that mandate it. The performance and complexity overhead rarely justifies its use in modern applications.
Last updated on