Difference: SOAP vs REST vs GRAPHQL vs gRPC
SOAP
What it is: SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol): XML-based protocol with strict standards and built-in error handling, security, and transaction support.
Characteristics: Protocol-heavy, stateful operations supported, extensive tooling ecosystem.
Use cases:
- Enterprise applications requiring formal contracts (WSDL)
- Financial services, healthcare, government systems
- Systems needing built-in security (WS-Security)
- Legacy system integration
Current status: Largely outdated for new projects, but still maintained in existing systems.
Why it’s discouraged:
- Verbose XML overhead
- Complex tooling requirements
- Pool performance compared to modern alternatives
- Limited browser support
Still used when:
- Working with legacy enterprise systems, financial institutions with existing SOAP infrastructure
- When WS-* standards are contractually required.
Example:
WSDL Definition (simplified):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
targetNamespace="http://example.com/user-service">
<message name="GetUserRequest">
<part name="userId" type="xsd:int"/>
</message>
<message name="GetUserResponse">
<part name="user" type="tns:User"/>
</message>
</definitions>Request:
POST /user-service HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
SOAPAction: "GetUser"
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<GetUserRequest xmlns="http://example.com/user-service">
<userId>123</userId>
</GetUserRequest>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>Response:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<GetUserResponse xmlns="http://example.com/user-service">
<user>
<id>123</id>
<n>John Doe</n>
<email>john@example.com</email>
</user>
</GetUserResponse>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>REST
What it is REST (Representational State Transfer): Architecture style using HTTP methods with stateless, resource-based URLs.
Use cases:
- Public APIs and web services
- CRUD applications on resources
- Mobile app backends
- Simple, cacheable operations
Current status: dominant and widely used; remains the go-to choice for most web APIs. Why it’s still recommended: Simple, well-understood, excellent tooling, caching benefits, stateless nature fits web architecture.
Example:
API design:
GET /users/123 # Get user
POST /users # Create user
PUT /users/123 # Update user
DELETE /users/123 # Delete userRequest:
httpGET /users/123 HTTP/1.1
Host: api.example.com
Accept: application/jsonResponse:
{
"id": 123,
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"createdAt": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}GraphQL
What it is: Query language and runtime allowing clients to request exactly the data they need.
Characteristics: Single endpoint, client-specified queries, strong typed schema, real-time capabilities.
Use cases:
- Frontend-driven applications with varying data requirements
- Mobile aps needing efficient data fetching
- APIs serving multiple client types
- Real-time subscriptions
Current status: Strongly growing adoption. Use with care in write-heavy or streaming scenarios due to complexity and cache challenges.
Considerations:
- Adds complexity (caching, security, N+1 queries)
- Overkill for simple CRUD APIs
- Excellent for complex, data-driven frontends
Example: Schema:
type User {
id: ID!
name: String!
email: String!
posts: [Post!]!
}
type Post {
id: ID!
title: String!
content: String!
author: User!
}
type Query {
user(id: ID!): User
users: [User!]!
}Query:
POST /graphql HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
{
"query": "query GetUser($id: ID!) { user(id: $id) { id name email posts { title } } }",
"variables": { "id": "123" }
}Response:
{
"data": {
"user": {
"id": "123",
"name": "John Doe",
"email": "john@example.com",
"posts": [{ "title": "My First Post" }, { "title": "GraphQL Tips" }]
}
}
}gRPC
What it is gRPC(Google Remote Procedure Call): High-performance RPC framework using Protocol Buffers and HTTP/2.
Use cases:
- Microservices communication
- High-throughput, low-latency systems
- Polyglot environments (multiple languages)
- Streaming operations
Characteristics: Binary serialization, HTTP/2 multiplexing, code generation, bi-directional streaming.
Current status: Actively developed and increasingly adopted.
Considerations:
- Limited browser support (needs grpc-web)
- Primarily for backend-to-backend communication
- Excellent for microservices architectures
Example:
Protocol buffer definition:
syntax = "proto3";
package user;
service UserService {
rpc GetUser(GetUserRequest) returns (User);
rpc ListUsers(ListUsersRequest) returns (stream User);
}
message GetUserRequest {
int32 id = 1;
}
message User {
int32 id = 1;
string name = 2;
string email = 3;
}
message ListUsersRequest {
int32 limit = 1;
}Client (TypeScript, generated):
import { UserServiceClient } from './generated/user_grpc_pb';
import { GetUserRequest } from './generated/user_pb';
const client = new UserServiceClient('localhost:50051');
const request = new GetUserRequest();
request.setId(123);
client.getUser(request, (error, response) => {
if (error) {
console.error('Error:', error);
} else {
console.log('User:', {
id: response.getId(),
name: response.getName(),
email: response.getEmail()
});
}
});Differences Summary
| Feature | SOAP | REST | GraphQL | gRPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol | Uses HTTP, SMTP, etc. | HTTP | HTTP | HTTP/2 |
| Data Format | XML only | JSON, XML, etc. | JSON (or custom) | Protobuf (binary) |
| Contract | WSDL (strongly typed) | None (or OpenAPI/Swagger) | Strong schema (SDL) | Strong schema (.proto) |
| Flexibility | Rigid | Moderate | Highly flexible | Rigid but efficient |
| Versioning | Built-in | Manual (URI-based) | Schema evolution | Built-in via .proto evolution |
| Performance | Heavy (XML overhead) | Lightweight | Variable (can overfetch) | Very fast, low latency |
| Streaming | Limited | Not native | Not native | Native support (bi-directional) |
| Tooling | Mature in enterprise | Widely supported | Strong dev tooling | Requires gRPC-aware tools |
Recommendations
- New web APIs: Start with REST, consider GraphQL if you have complex client data needs.
- Microservices: gRPC for internal communication, REST for external APIs.
- Legacy Integration: SOAP only when required by existing systems.
- Avoid SOAP for new projects unless you have specific enterprise requirements that mandate it. The performance and complexity overhead rarely justifies its use in modern applications.